Alira Health

Frequently Asked Questions

Nuclear Medicine Market in 2024: Challenges and Opportunities

Nuclear Medicine Market in 2024: Challenges and Opportunities

Nuclear medicine is a complex area of pharmaceuticals, featuring unique and often challenging dynamics, including varied regulatory landscapes, specialized logistics, and high prices. But it’s also an area that presents a significant opportunity. In this FAQ, our expert Akash Nayak Karopadi answers most frequent questions about the nuclear medicine market. 

How would you describe the current market landscape for nuclear medicine?

The nuclear medicine market is broadly categorized into diagnostics and therapeutics. Within diagnostics, there are positron emission tomography (PET) and single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) based radiotracers. Therapeutics encompasses targeted therapies (which further include beta and alpha therapies), brachytherapy, pure radionuclide therapy, and systemic radiation therapy.

Most of the global market is concentrated in the United States (US), the European Union’s EU4 countries (Germany, France, Italy, and Spain) and the United Kingdom (UK), accounting for well over 80% of the market share. The remaining market is primarily comprised of Japan, Canada, South Korea, China, and Australia. The market remains highly consolidated, with major players such as Novartis, Lantheus, Curium, and a few others capturing a substantial share of both revenues and market capitalization in this space.

What has shaped the nuclear medicine market in recent years?

Nuclear medicine initially focused on diagnostic applications using SPECT with technetium-99m and fluorodeoxyglucose-18 PET imaging, along with limited therapeutic uses like that of iodine-131. However, the advent of beta therapies, particularly lutetium Lu 177 for the treatment of somatostatin receptor–positive tumors, and the growing interest in alpha emitters, such as actinium-225 (Ac225) and lead-212 (PB-212), are fueling the expansion of radiopharmaceutical-based therapies. These therapies have proven not only efficacious in oncology but also highly targeted, contributing to the macro trend of precision medicine and theranostics, especially when combined with radiotracers.

Today, the nuclear medicine landscape features a strong emphasis on therapeutics, highlighted by the emergence of the first blockbuster products in the field. Significant developments include Novartis’ acquisition of AAA, the introduction of pioneering targeted therapies like Lutathera® and Pluvicto™, and the market entry of AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, and BMS through strategic acquisitions (Fusion, Point, and RayzeBio, respectively).

What are the growth projections for the nuclear medicine sector, and what factors are driving this growth?

Nuclear medicine is rapidly advancing at a compound annual growth rate of 12-15%,1 driven primarily by theranostics, which combines diagnostic imaging and targeted therapy to offer precise treatments for oncology and some neurological disorders. The commercialization and development of novel radiopharmaceuticals for both diagnostic and therapeutic applications, along with growing acceptance in fields beyond oncology—such as cardiology, neurology, and musculoskeletal indications—further propel this growth. Artificial intelligence integration enhances efficiency and accuracy in procedures, aiding in image interpretation and treatment planning. Additionally, improved regulatory and reimbursement policies significantly shape and support the market’s expansion.

How do recent acquisitions by big pharma impact the landscape?

Recent acquisitions by BMS, Eli Lilly, and AstraZeneca highlight a growing interest in nuclear medicine among major pharmaceutical companies, which could lead to the accelerated introduction of new radiopharmaceuticals, larger clinical trials, and faster uptake of radioligand therapy. These companies’ financial power enables increased funding and mergers and acquisition activity, expansion into new therapeutic areas and indications (breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, and possibly Alzheimer’s disease), and the ability to drive policy changes in key markets like the US. Such changes could include better reimbursement rates and coverage for therapies, more access to government funding, and clearer definition of regulatory requirements, among others.

How do recent market access and reimbursement developments impact investment opportunities in nuclear medicine?

Reimbursement continues to pose a significant challenge in the US, but there have been some promising developments, such as the new Proposed Medicare Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) Rule2 for calendar year 2025 for improved payment for specialized diagnostic radiopharmaceuticals by Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services to ensure providers receive adequate reimbursement. Despite ongoing political discussions, including a proposal in the US to classify radiopharmaceuticals as drugs rather than supplies3 and to extend pass-through periods, reimbursement remains a major concern for novel radiopharmaceuticals.

In the EU market, reimbursement is determined at a national level, resulting in varying approaches across countries. Understanding the reimbursement landscape in each country, particularly in key markets like the UK and EU4, is crucial for companies planning to develop and launch new products.

Are there any emerging trends or disruptive technologies that could affect the industry going into 2025?

The next major trend poised to reshape the industry is the anticipated approval of the first targeted alpha therapy (TAT). This breakthrough has the potential to revolutionize both the nuclear medicine field and oncology. RayzeBio, now part of BMS, is leading the way with RYZ101, also known as Ac225 DOTATATE, which could become the world’s first approved TAT, positioning the company as a pioneer in this transformative area. However, significant challenges remain, including the availability of Ac225 and other necessary isotopes and the likelihood of favorable reimbursement.

The stability and sustainability of a robust supply chain can also present problems; requirements include adequate floor space at contract development and manufacturing organization facilities, delivery networks capable of handling short half-life isotopes like Pb-212, and redundancies in general across the manufacturing chain to ensure unhindered access. Despite these obstacles, the industry remains optimistic and is gearing up to tackle these challenges head-on.

Sources
  1. GlobalData and Marketandmarkets.
  2. Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Hospital Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS). https://www.cms.gov/cms-guide-medical-technology-companies-and-other-interested-parties/payment/opps#:~:text=Transitional%20pass-through%20payments%20provide,the%20cost%20of%20those%20items.
  3. H.R.3772 – Medicare Diagnostic Radiopharmaceutical Payment Equity Act of 2019. https://www.congress.gov/bill/116th-congress/house-bill/3772.
Akash

Expert answers provided by Akash Nayak Karopadi, Principal.  

Akash

Expert answers provided by Akash Nayak Karopadi, Principal.  

Discover Our Latest Nuclear Medicine Case Studies

Welcome to Alira Health. This site is best viewed in Chrome, Microsoft Edge, or Firefox.